Mechanics Liens, Stop Notices and Payment Bonds Archives

Strict Compliance with Statutory Provisions Governing Proof of Service of 20-Day Preliminary Notice is Not Required

In a new case, Hub Construction Specialties, Inc. v. Esperanza Charities, Inc. (filed February 8, 2016, Second District, Div. Eight) 2016 S.O.S. 787, the Court held that under the prior mechanic's lien code (Former Civ. Code, § 3097.1, subd. (a); Stats. 2010, ch. 697, § 16 [repealed].) strict compliance with proof of service provisions was not required when there was evidence that there had been strict compliance with the provisions regarding service of notice.

Prejudgment Interest is Set at 7% on a Mechanic's Lien Claim Against Non-Contracting, Innocent Owners

In a recent case, Palomar Grading & Paving, Inc. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al., Court of Appeal (2014 S.O.S. 4573) the appeal court held that "We determine it is the constitutional default rate that should apply to prejudgment interest on a mechanic's lien as applied to noncontracting, innocent owners."  California's constitutional default rate for prejudgment interest is 7%. 

Can a project owner sue a contractor for slander of title on the basis that the contractor's mechanic's lien lacks merit? The answer is no

Project owners facing mechanic's lien claims they believe lack merit will often threaten to retaliate with a slander of title action against the claimant. But the law generally does not allow a slander claim against a lien claimant, even if the claim lacks merit. In a recent appeals court case a project owner sought to have the court create a lack of merit exception to this rule. The court refused to do so, instead confirming that even unmeritorious lien claims are privileged acts and not subject to a slander claim.

A private works bonded stop notice could be invalidated as a result of a clerical error in stating the claim amount

In a unpublished decision filed October 27, 2011 the Court of Appeals confirmed that a private works bonded stop notice could be invalidated as a result of a clerical error in stating the claim amount.

Are You Prepared For The 2012 Changes to California Lien Laws?

Over eight years ago, the California Law Review Commission started a review of the California construction lien laws. In 2008, the Commission recommended that the existing mechanics lien statutory laws be modified. Their objective was to modernize, simplify, and clarify the lien laws, and make them more user friendly, efficient, and effective. That recommendation (SB 189) was signed into law by the Governor in 2009 and goes into effect on July 1, 2012. This year further legislation (SB 190) was passed to "clean-up" minor issues with the widespread changes made in SB 189.

Beginning in January 2011 Mechanic's Lien Claimants will be Required to Serve Project Owners a Specified Notice Before Recording Their Lien

At present, to record a mechanic's lien a claimant need only to complete and execute a claim of lien form and record the same at the county recorder's office in the county where the project was located. The claimant has no obligation to inform the project owner that the lien has been recorded. Occasionally project owners first learn that their property is subject to a mechanic's lien when they are served an already filed lawsuit seeking foreclosure of the lien.

Beginning in January 2011 a Lis Pendens Will Become a Mandatory Element to Enforcing a Mechanic's Lien

A lis pendens (a.k.a. notice of pendency of action) is a document which is recorded against the title of real property to notify interested parties that litigation is pending which impacts the said property's title. The lis pendens protects claimants by ensuring that their claim is fully attached to the property and that future interest holders take title subject to the claim, and protects future interest holders by warning them that the claim exists.

Could California Private Works Stop Notice Claims Be Challenged on Basis That State Stop Notice Law is Preempted by Federal Lending Regulations?

In this era of declining property values, owner abandoned projects, and defaulting developers, the private works stop notice has become a central element in contractor payment claims. The private works stop notice is served on a construction lender along with a bond, and creates a lien on undisbursed construction loan funds. But a recent trial court order in a Federal District Court in Arizona shows that this remedy of last resort may be threatened by a new legal challenge.

Our Awards and Professional Legal Associations

  • Rated by Super Lawyers - William C. Last, Jr. - Visit
  • Avvo Rating - 9.3 Superb - Top Attorney Construction
  • AV Peer Review Rated
  • The State Bar of California
  • San Matco County Bar Association - SMCBA
  • LACBA - Los Angeles County Bar Association
  • American Bar Association Forum on the Construction Industry
  • Bay Area Chapter - SMACNA
  • The Associated General Contractors of America
  • American Subcontractors Association
  • Peninsula Builders Exchange
  • CLSA
Email Us For A Response

Contact our attorneys now

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Last & Faoro
177 Bovet Road, Suite 550
San Mateo, CA 94402

Toll Free: 866-904-4725
Phone: 650-425-7679
Fax: 650-696-8365
Map & Directions